Brexit: Government faces legal action over Article 50 process

Remain campaigners in Parliament Square. The government is facing legal action over the process
Matt Cardy/Getty Images
Robin de Peyer4 July 2016
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

A top London law firm is taking action over Parliament's role in the process of the UK withdrawing from the EU.

Mishcon de Reya said Article 50 - which would need to be triggered to kick start the formal Brexit process – must not be invoked without an Act of Parliament.

The firm is acting on behalf of an anonymous group of clients, thought to include business people and academics.

It says a prime minister would be acting unlawfully if he or she triggered Article 50 without a full debate and a vote in Parliament.

Legal experts claim the move could make it less likely for Britain to leave the EU after the country backed Brexit by 52%-48%.

What happened after the UK voted to leave the EU?

The government has said Parliament "will clearly have a role" in "finding the best way forward".

Kasra Nouroozi, a Mishcon de Reya partner, said: "We must ensure that the Government follows the correct process to have legal certainty and protect the UK Constitution and the sovereignty of Parliament in these unprecedented circumstances.

"The result of the Referendum is not in doubt, but we need a process that follows UK law to enact it."

Mischon says it has been in correspondence with government officials to seek assurances over the process.

It says that constitutionally, legislation is required to override the law passed in 1972 enshrining the UK's membership of the EU. This would mean an Act of Parliament would need to be passed by MPs.

David Cameron with European Commission president Jean-Claude Juncker
Reuters

A clear majority of MPs in the House of Commons backed staying in the EU during the referendum campaign.

Mr Nouroozi added: "The outcome of the Referendum itself is not legally binding and for the current or future prime minister to invoke Article 50 without the approval of Parliament is unlawful.

"We must make sure this is done properly for the benefit of all UK citizens. Article 50 simply cannot be invoked without a full debate and vote in Parliament.

"Everyone in Britain needs the Government to apply the correct constitutional process and allow Parliament to fulfil its democratic duty which is to take into account the results of the Referendum along with other factors and make the ultimate decision."

A Cabinet Office spokesman told the BBC: "As the prime minister said in the Commons, we have now got to look at all the detailed arrangements, and Parliament will clearly have a role in making sure that we find the best way forward.

"It will be important to ensure in moving ahead that the interests of all parts of the United Kingdom are protected and advanced."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in