Ed Balls: Beware a blank cheque for Wonga

 
P17 Labour's Ed Balls
WEST END FINAL

Get our award-winning daily news email featuring exclusive stories, opinion and expert analysis

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Ed Balls today warned against writing a “blank cheque” to payday loan companies by forcing people to wait seven days to get jobless benefits — but stopped short of opposing the move.

The Shadow chancellor argued that Labour needed time to examine the new policy announced by George Osborne yesterday as part of measures imposing new welfare restrictions.

Currently, unemployed people have to wait three days before getting JobSeekers Allowance. Mr Balls told BBC radio: “We will need to look very carefully at what this means.

“If this is a blank cheque to Wonga and other payday loan companies, that would be a very bad thing. If, on the other hand, it’s a sensible way to focus on job search, it might not be.”

But the reform was condemned by Sarah Teather, Liberal Democrat MP for Brent Central, warning it would lead to individuals being “unable to feed themselves and their children and pay their rent”.

The row came as payday lenders were referred for a full-blown investigation by the Competition Commission after the Office of Fair Trading uncovered “deep-rooted” problems with the industry, without singling out any particular company.

Meanwhile, the Archbishop of Westminster, Archbishop Vincent Nichols, backed the Government for spending 0.7 per cent of GDP on overseas aid but added: “Here in the UK we all need to do more to protect the weakest and most vulnerable, many of whom are already bearing the brunt of the economic downturn and recent spending cuts.”

Separately, the Institute for Fiscal Studies said a million public sector jobs are set to go between 2010 and 2017-18 under the Coalition’s current plans.

But it said the job losses have been more than compensated for by an increase in private sector jobs, particularly in London.

IFS director Paul Johnson said it was likely that there will be tax rises after the 2015 general election. If they aimed to restore the Tories’ 80-20 split between cuts and tax rises, then that would mean £6 billion more of tax — £230 a year extra per household.

Mr Johnson backed Mr Osborne’s decision to reform the school funding system, saying such a move was “long overdue” and “brave”.

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in

MORE ABOUT