Shortest-ever serving Prime Minister Liz Truss is locked in a row over missing dressing gowns from a country estate where she planned her tilt at Number 10.
Liz Truss is contesting a £12,000 bill for costs incurred relating to her use of the grace-and-favour Chevening estate she had access to as foreign secretary, the Mail on Sunday reported.
The invoice covers the period last summer when she was preparing for her premiership and is understood to have been received by Ms Truss several weeks ago.
Chevening, a 115-room country retreat in Kent, was left to the nation by the 7th Earl Stanhope after his death in 1967 and has traditionally been used by the foreign secretary of the day.
The latest invoice contains a mixture of costs for her personally and costs for official government business with civil servants including (Cabinet Secretary) Simon Case and senior officials from other departments who met at Chevening during the transition preparations
Spokesman for Liz Truss
The PA news agency has been told Ms Truss is happy to replace any items said to be missing from the estate after it was reported that bathrobes and slippers at the residence had disappeared following her time there.
But the former prime minister maintains the vast majority of the invoice relates to official government business, for which she should not be liable, rather than personal expenses.
The ministerial code states that ministers must not allow the costs of party or personal events in grace-and-favour estates to fall to the public purse.
A source had told the Mail that Ms Truss used the residence as a “mini-No 10”, holding meetings with her inner circle which often turned into parties in the evening.
A spokesman for Ms Truss said: “Liz always paid for the costs of her personal guests at Chevening.
Read More
“The latest invoice contains a mixture of costs for her personally and costs for official government business with civil servants including (Cabinet Secretary) Simon Case and senior officials from other departments who met at Chevening during the transition preparations.
“The latter constitutes the majority of the bill. It would be inappropriate for her to pay the costs for officials as it would have breached the Civil Service Code for civil servants to accept hospitality during the leadership campaign. She has therefore asked for this to be billed separately.”
A Government spokesperson said: “Costs and funding relating to Chevening House are a matter for the Chevening Trust.
“Where appropriate, we work closely with them to ensure costs incurred are allocated accordingly.”
