Jagger and Jerry fight over future of their £10m Richmond mansion

 
1/3
18 March 2013
The Weekender

Sign up to our free weekly newsletter for exclusive competitions, offers and theatre ticket deals

I would like to be emailed about offers, event and updates from Evening Standard. Read our privacy notice.

Mick Jagger and Jerry Hall are said to be fighting over their marital home in Richmond because the Stone didn't sign the property over after their annulment.

The former couple, who annulled their marriage in 1999 after being together for 21 years, bought the house in Richmond, south west London, for £2.5 million in 1991 while Hall was pregnant with their daughter Georgia, now 20.

The former model is reportedly demanding the property be signed over to her.

It was initially thought Mick had already given the house, now worth £10 million, to Jerry, but it still remains a mutual asset.

Hall wants Jagger to provide her with "clarity" on the property and let her know what his intentions are for it.

A friend of Hall's told the Daily Mail: "[The house] is a source of increasing concern to her as she gets older."

Hall - who also children Elizabeth, 28, James, 27, and Gabriel, 15, with Jagger - had been considering selling the 26-room property to release funds as she prepares for her retirement.

The friend added: "I know that she has been thinking about it (selling up). Her mum has just died and all of that stirs up where you want to be.

"It could simply be an exercise in finding out what her possibilities are. That said, she will want to sell up when she gets older. At the moment, it's just her and Gabriel there, and it's a big house for two people. The upkeep is very expensive, too. When the roof goes, it costs thousands."

However, sources close to Jagger believe it is unlikely he will sign the estate over. It is believed he had legal clauses drawn up which mean Hall can only stay at the house until she is 65. The conditions also allegedly state she would have to move out if she remarried.

The 69-year-old musician's spokesman refused to comment on the matter, simply stating: "This is confidential."

Create a FREE account to continue reading

eros

Registration is a free and easy way to support our journalism.

Join our community where you can: comment on stories; sign up to newsletters; enter competitions and access content on our app.

Your email address

Must be at least 6 characters, include an upper and lower case character and a number

You must be at least 18 years old to create an account

* Required fields

Already have an account? SIGN IN

By clicking Sign up you confirm that your data has been entered correctly and you have read and agree to our Terms of use , Cookie policy and Privacy notice .

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged in